THIS IS WATER
was invited to speak to the 2005 graduating class of Kenyon College,
on a subject of his choosing. It being the only such address he ever made.
There are these two young fish swimming along & they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them & says, “Morning boys, how’s the water?”
And the two young fish swim on for a bit, & then eventually one of them looks over at the other & goes, “What the fuck is ‘water’?”
This is a standard requirement of US commencement speeches, the deployment of didactic little parable-ish stories.
The story thing turns out to be one of the better, less bullshitty conventions of the genre… but if you’re worried that I plan to present myself here as the wise old fish explaining what water is to you younger fish, please don’t be.
I am not the wise old fish.
The immediate point of the fish story is merely that the most obvious, ubiquitous, important realities are often the ones that are the hardest to see & talk about.
Stated as an English sentence, of course, this is just a banal platitude—but the fact is that, in the day-to-day trenches of adult existence, banal platitudes can have a life-or-death importance.
Or so I wish to suggest to you on this dry & lovely day.
Of course the main requirement of speeches like this is that I’m supposed to talk about your liberal arts education’s meaning, to try to explain why the degree you’re about to receive has actual human value instead of just material payoff.
But I’m going to posit to you that the liberal arts cliche turns out not to be insulting at all, because really significant education in thinking that we’re supposed to get in a place like this isn’t really about the capacity to think, but rather about the choice of what to think about.
If your complete freedom of choice regarding what to think about seems too obvious to waste time talking about, I’d ask you to think about fish & water, [and to bracket], for just a few minutes, your skepticism about the value of the totally obvious.
Here’s another didactic little story:
There are these two guys sitting together in a bar in the remote Alaskan wilderness.
One of the guys is religious, the other’s an atheist, & they’re arguing about the existence of God with that special intensity that comes after about the fourth beer.
And the atheist says, “Look, it’s not like I don’t have actual reasons for not believing in God.”
It’s not like I haven’t ever experimented with the whole God-and-prayer thing.
Just last month, I got caught off away from the camp in that terrible blizzard, & I was totally lost, & it was fifty below, & so I did, I tried it: I fell to my knees in the snow & cried out, ‘God, if there is a God, I’m lost in this blizzard, & I’m gonna die if you don’t help me’!”
And now, in the bar, the religious guy looks at the atheist all puzzled: “Well then, you must believe now,” he says. “After all, here you are. Alive.”
The atheist rolls his eyes like the religious guy is a total simp: “No, man, all that happened was a couple Eskimos just happened to come wandering by, & they showed me the way back to the camp.”
It’s easy to run this story through a kind of standard liberal arts analysis: The exact same experience can mean two completely different things to two different people, given those people’s two different belief templates & two different ways of constructing meaning from experience.
Because we prize tolerance & diversity of belief, nowhere in our liberal arts analysis do we want to claim that one guy’s interpretation is true & the other guy’s is false or bad.
Which is fine, except we also never end up talking about just where these individual templates & beliefs come from, meaning, where they come from inside the two guys.
As if a person’s most basic orientation toward the world & the meaning of his experience were somehow automatically hardwired, like height or shoe size, or absorbed from the culture, like language.
As if how we construct meaning were not actually a matter of personal, intentional choice, of conscious decision.
Plus, there’s the matter of arrogance.
The nonreligious guy is so totally, obnoxiously confident in his dismissal of the possibility that the Eskimos had anything to do with his prayer for help.
True, there are plenty of religious people who seem arrogantly certain of their own interpretations, too.
They’re probably even more repulsive than atheists, at least to most of us here, but the fact is that religious dogmatists’ problem is exactly the same as the story’s atheist’s—arrogance, blind certainty, a closed-mindedness that’s like an imprisonment so complete that the prisoner doesn’t even know he’s locked up.
The point here is that I think this is one part of what the liberal arts mantra of “teaching how to think” is really supposed to mean: to be just a little less arrogant, to have some “critical awareness” about myself & my certainties… because a huge percentage of the stuff that I tend to be automatically certain of is, it turns out, totally wrong & deluded.
I have learned the hard way, as I predict you graduates will, too.
Here’s one example of the utter wrongness of something I tend to be automatically sure of.
Everything in my own immediate experience supports my deep belief that I am the absolute center of the universe, the realest, most vivid & important person in existence.
We rarely think about this sort of natural, basic self-centeredness, because it’s so socially repulsive, but it’s pretty much the same for all of us, deep down.
It is out default setting, hardwired into our boards at birth.
This about it: There is no experience you’ve had that you were not at the absolute center of.
The world as you experience it is there in front of you, or behind you, to the left or right of you, on your TV, on your monitor, or whatever.
Other people’s thought & feelings have to be communicated to you somehow, but your own are so immediate, urgent, real.
You get the idea.
But please don’t worry that I’m getting ready to preach to you about compassion or other-directedness or all the so-called “virtues.”
This is not a matter of virtue—it’s a matter of my choosing to do the work of somehow altering or getting free of my natural, hardwired default setting, which is to be deeply & literally self-centered, & to see & interpret everything through this lens of self.
People who can adjust their natural default setting this way are often described as being, quote, “well-adjusted”, which I suggest to you is not an accidental term.
Given the academic setting here, an obvious question is how much of this work of adjusting our default setting involves actual knowledge or intellect.
The answer, not surprisingly, is that it depends what kind of knowledge we’re talking about.
Probably the most dangerous thing about an academic education, at least in my own case, is that it enables my tendency to over-intellectualize stuff, to get lost in abstract thinking instead of simply paying attention to what’s going on in front of me.
Instead of paying attention to what’s going on inside me.
As I’m sure you guys know by now, it is extremely difficult to stay alert & attentive instead of getting hypnotized by the constant monolog inside your head.
What you don’t yet know are the stakes of this struggle.
In the twenty years since my own graduation, I have come gradually to understand these stakes, & to see that the liberal arts cliche about “teaching you how to think” was actually shorthand for a very deep & imporant truth.
“Learning how to think” really means learning how to exercise some control over how & what you think.
It means being conscious & aware enough to choose what you pay attention to & to choose how you construct meaning from experience.
Because if you cannot or will not exercise this kind of choice in adult life, you will be totally hosed.
Think of the old cliche about the mind being “an excellent servant but a terrible master”.
This, like many cliches, so lame & banal on the surface, actually expresses a great & terrible truth.
It is not the least bit coincidental that the adults who commit suicide with firearms nearly always shoot themselves in… the head.
And the truth is that most of these suicides are actually dead long before they pull the trigger.
And I submit that this is what the real, no-shit value of your liberal arts education is supposed to be about: How to keep from going through your comfortable, prosperous, respectable adult life dead, unconscious, a slave to your head & to your natural default setting of being uniquely, completely, imperially alone, day in & day out.
This may sound like hyperbole, or abstract nonsense.
So let’s get concrete.
The plain fact is that you graduating seniors do not yet have an clue what “day in, day out” really means.
There happens to be whole large parts of adult American life that nobody talks about in commencement speeches.
One such part involves boredom, routine, & petty frustration.
The parents & older folks here will know all too well what I’m talking about.
By way of example, let’s say it’s an average adult day, & you get up in the morning, go to you challenging, white-collar college-graduate job, & you work hard for nine or ten hours, & you’re stressed out, & all you want is to go home & have a good supper & maybe unwind for a couple hours & then hit the rack early because you have to get up the next day & do it all again.
But then remember there’s no food at home—you haven’t had time to shop this week because of your challenging job—& so now after work you have to get in your car & drive to the supermarket.
It’s the end of the workday, & the traffic’s very bad, so getting to the store takes way longer than it should, & when you finally get there, the supermarket is very crowded, because of course it’s the time of day when all the other people with jobs also try to squeeze in some grocery shopping, & the store is hideously fluorescently lit, & infused with soul-killing Muzak or corporate pop, & it’s pretty much the last place you want to be, but you can’t just get in & quickly out.
You have to wander all over the huge, overlit store’s crowded aisles to find the stuff you want, & you have to maneuver your junky cart through all these other tired, hurried people with carts, & of course there are also the glacially slow old people & the spacey people & the ADHD kids who all block the aisle, & you have to grit your teeth & try to be polite as you ask them to let you by, & eventually, finally, you get all your supper supplies, except now it turns out there aren’t enough checkout lanes open even though it’s the end-of-the-day rush, so the checkout line is incredibly long.
Which is stupid & infuriating, but you can’t take your fury out on the frantic lady working the register, who is overworked at a job whose daily tedium & meaninglessness surpass the imagination of any of us here at a prestigious college… but anyway, you finally get to the checkout line’s front, & you pay for you food, & wait to get your card authenticated by a machine, & you get told to “Have a nice day” in a voice that is the voice of absolute death.
And then you have to take your creepy flimsy plastic bags of groceries in your cart with the one crazy wheel that pulls maddeningly to the left, all the way out through the crowded, bumpy, littery parking lot, & try to load the bags in your car in such a way that everything doesn’t fall out of the bags & roll around in the trunk on the way home, & then you have to drive all the way home through slow, heavy, SUV-intensive rush-hour traffic, et cetera, et cetera.
Everyone here has done this, of course—but it hasn’t yet been part of you graduates’ actual life routine, day after week after month after year.
But it will be, & many more dreary, annoying, seemingly meaningless routines besides…
Except that’s not the point.
The point is that petty, frustrating crap like this is exactly where the work of choosing comes in.
Because the traffic jams & crowded aisles & long checkout lines give me time to think, & if I don’t make a conscious decision about how to think & what to pay attention to, I’m gonna be pissed & miserable everytime I have to food-shop, because my natural default setting is that situations like this are really all about me, about my hungriness & my fatigue & my desire to just get home, & it’s going to seem, for all the world, like everybody else is just in my way, & who the fuck are all these people in my way?
And look at how repulsive most of them are & how stupid & cow-like & dead-eyed & nonhuman they seem here in the checkout line, or at how annoying & rude it is that people are talking loudly on cell phones in the middle of the line, & look at how deeply unfair this is: I’ve worked really hard all day & I’m starved & tired & I can’t even get home to eat & unwind because of all these stupid goddamn people.
Or, of course, if I’m in a more socially conscious, liberal arts form of my default setting, I can spend time in the end-of-the-day traffic jam being angry & disgusted at all the huge, stupid, lane-blocking SUVs & Hummers & V-12 pickup trucks burning their wasteful, selfish, forty-gallon tanks of gas, & I can dwell on the fact that the patriotic or religious bumper-stickers always seem to be on the biggest, most disgustingly selfish vehicles driven by the ugliest, most inconsiderate & aggressive drivers, who are usually talking on cell phones as they cut people off in order to get just twenty stupid feet ahead in the traffic jam, & I can think how our children’s children will despise us for wasting all the future’s fuel & probably screwing up the climate, & how spoiled & stupid & selfish & disgusting we all are, & how it all just sucks, & so on & so forth…
Look, if I choose to think this way, fine, lots of us do—except that thinking this way tends to be so easy & automatic it doesn’t have to be a choice.
Thinking this way is my natural default setting.
It’s the automatic, unconscious way that I experience the boring, frustrating, crowded parts of adult life when I’m operating on the automatic, unconscious belief that I am the center of the world & that my immediate needs & feelings are what should determine the world’s priorities.
The thing is that there are obviously different ways to think about these kinds of situations.
In this traffic, all these vehicles stuck & idling in my way: It’s not impossible that some of these people in SUVs have been in horrible auto-accidents in the past & now find driving so traumatic that their therapist has all but ordered them to get a huge, heavy SUV so they can feel safe enough to drive; or that the Hummer that just cut me off is maybe being driven by a father whose little child is hurt or sick in the seat next to him, & he’s trying to rush to the hospital, & he’s in a way bigger, more legitimate hurry than I am—it is actually I who am in his way.
Or I can choose to force myself to consider the likelihood that everyone else in the supermarket’s checkout line is probably as bored & frustrated as I am, & that some of these people actually have much harder, more tedious or painful lives than I do, overall.
And so on.
Again, please don’t think that I am giving you moral advice, or that I’m saying you are “supposed to” think this way, or that anyone expects you to just automatically do it, because it’s hard, it takes will & mental effort, & if you’re like me, some days you won’t be able to do it, or else you just flat-out won’t want to.
But most days, if you’re aware enough to give yourself a choice, you can choose to look differently at this fat, dead-eyed, over-made-up lady who just screamed at her kid in the checkout line—maybe she’s not usually like this; maybe she’s been up three straight night holding the hand of her husband, who’s dying of bone cancer, or maybe this very lady is the low-wage clerk at the motor vehicles department who just yesterday helped your spouse resolve a nightmarish red-tape problem through some small act of bureaucratic kindness.
Of course, none of this is likely, but it’s also not impossible—it just depends on what you want to consider.
If you’re automatically sure that you know what reality is & who & what is really important—if you want to operate on your default setting—then you, like me, probably will not consider possibilities that aren’t pointless & annoying.
Not that that mystical stuff’s necessarily true: The only thing that’s capital-T True is that you get to decide how you’re going to try to see it.
This, I submit, is the freedom of real education, of learning how to be well-adjusted: You get to consciously decide what has meaning & what doesn’t.
You get to decide what to worship… Because there’s something else that’s true. In the day-to-day trenches of adult life, there is actually no such thing as atheism. There is no such thing as not worshipping. Everybody worships. The only choice we get is what to worship.
And an outstanding reason for choosing some sort of god or spiritual-type thing to worship—be it J.C. or Allah, be it Yahweh or the Wiccan mother-goddess or the Four Noble Truths or some infrangible set of ethical principles—is that pretty much anything else you worship will eat you alive.
If you worship money & things—if they are where you tap real meaning in life—then you will never have enough. Never feel you have enough.
It’s the truth.
Worship your own body & beauty & sexual allure & you will always feel ugly, & when time & age start showing, you will die a million deaths before they finally plant you.
On one level we all know this stuff already—it’s been codified as myths, proverbs, cliches, bromides, epigrams, parables: the skeleton of every great story.
The trick is keeping the truth up front in daily consciousness.
Worship power—you will feel weak & afraid, & you will need ever more power over others to keep the fear at bay.
Worship you intellect, being seen as smart—you will end up feeling stupid, a fraud, always on the verge of being found out.
And so on.
Look, the insidious thing about these forms of worship is not that they’re “evil” or sinful; it is that they are unconscious.
They are default settings.
They’re the kind of worship you just gradually slip into, day after day, getting more & more selective about what you see & how you measure value without ever being fully aware that that’s what you’re doing.
And the so-called “real world” will not discourage you from operating on your default settings, because the so-called “real world” of men & money & power hums along quite nicely on the fuel of fear & contempt & frustration & craving & the worship of the self.
Our own present culture has harnessed these forces in ways that have yielded extraordinary wealth & comfort & personal freedom.
The freedom of all to be lords of your tiny skull-sized kingdoms, alone at the center of all creation.
This kind of freedom has much to recommend it.
But of course there are all different kinds of freedom, & the kind that is most precious you will not hear much talked about in the great outside world of winning & achieving & displaying.
The really important kind of freedom involves attention, & awareness, & discipline, & effort, & being able truly to care about other people & to sacrifice for them, over & over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, everyday.
That is real freedom.
That is being taught how to think.
The alternative is unconsciousness, the default setting, the “rat race” —the constant, gnawing sense of having had lost some infinite thing.
I know that this stuff probably doesn’t sound fun & breezy or grandly inspirational the way a commencement speech’s central stuff should sound. What it is, so far as I can see, is the truth, with a whole lot of rhetorical bullshit pared away.
Obviously, you can think of it whatever you wish. But please don’t dismiss it as some finger-wagging sermon. None of this is about morality, or religion, or dogma, or big fancy questions of life after death.
The capital-T Truth is about life before death.
It is about making it to thirty, or maybe even fifty, without wanting to shoot yourself in the head.
It is about the real value of a real education, which has nothing to do with grades or degrees & everything to do with simple awareness—awareness of what is so real & essential, so hidden in plain sight all around us, that we have to keep reminding ourselves over & over:
“This is water.”
“This is water.”
“These Eskimos might be much more than they seem.”
It is unimaginably hard to do this—to live consciously, adultly, day in & day out.
Which means yet another cliche is true:
Your education really is the job of a lifetime, & it commences—Now.
I wish you way more than luck.